Wild animals are kept in captivity for a variety of reasons and in a range of environments, including zoos and circuses, scientific laboratories and also as pets at home. Caring for a captive animal takes time, money and knowledge to provide everything the animal needs, such as food, water and the correct environment, to prevent suffering and ensure good welfare, but many countries treat animals with terrible cruelty. In my opinion no wild animal should be kept in captivity except if an animal is injured or to save a species from extinction. I believe that caging a wild animal is regrettable. The owners of the parks often have a poor and disrespectful behavior towards animals.
Pinniped - Wikipedia
A zoo is a place where animals live in captivity and are put on display for people to view. It is an important debate whether animals should be kept in the zoos or not. Some say that it is necessary to capture them in order to protect them from poachers. Regarding all the efforts to kill animals for ivory, skins and medical aims, zoo is quite a safe place for them.
If wild animals were intended to be kept shut up in a jail, also known as a zoo, then what exactly is the point of contacting them wild animals anymore? Zoo authorities use many justifications to back up their place that having wild animals in captivity is necessary, but those justifications are neither moral nor necessary enough reasons to deny animals of their organic right to independence. Even under the best of conditions.
Zoos should be banned because animals should remain in the wild, and animals in zoos can get sick and die. The thesis is too broad. What are the reasons we should restrict freedom of speech? Why should we care?